Create your free account

By clicking “Register”, you agree to our
terms of service and privacy policy

Log in

OR

Reset password

Chess forum by Grandmasters

Tactic trainer

Hi everyone, do you know if out there there's something (a software or a website) where you can train tactics by selecting the motifs you want? I don't want like lichess where you can select one motif at time, but more than one time. Thank you

Replies

You can try Chesstempo where you can select several motives at the same time. 😁

Worth of a queen

What is the worth of a queen? I learned that it is worth 10 pawns when I was learning chess, but about two years ago, when I started playing chess online, I saw it is worth 9 pawns!  I read that it is because when you have two rooks you will win against a queen, but is there any other reason? Also, when did it changed, or I just learned it wrong?

Replies

It would depend on the situation. 

For example, a trapped queen wouldn't really be worth anything, whereas an active queen would be worth a lot more. 

Also, two rooks won't always win against a queen, because if they aren't working together (eg. defending each other), then the queen would overpower them.

We normally teach at beginners and kids that it is worth 9 pawns. You did not learn this wrong, as engines got stronger, the value of the pieces changed a bit generally. Again as it has been said the theoretical value of pieces change depending on the positions.😃

Benko instead of Modern Benoni

Hi everyone,

 

several times somewhere here I read that for example

Avetik is a big Modern Benoni fan. Now I am wondering why

the Benko is proposed for 2000+ players.

Is it because it is (much) easier to learn? (This is at least my impression)

I like the Benko and the course here very much but I am interesed in how you made up your choice.

 

Of course I am interested in anybody's opinion.

 

Thank you!

Replies

I think it was based on complexity, but I think they underestimated the Benko complexity a lot, hence the reboot/additions in the pipeline.

Dear Coaches,

I am really curious 😉

Thank you!

Sorry Thomas, it skipped my mind! I thought I already replied to this one!

The Benoni is a very, very sharp defense where you need to walk a very thin line of only moves in a few variations. It is also very easy to get steamrolled by White if you do not have a clear positional sense and sharp eye for tactics and mostly for counterattack. In some lines you can even be a couple of pawns down with compensation with development. Still we cannot propose this since we think that it would be too complicated. It is a very good weapon in an must win game (if you have an attacking and sharp style of play) and it is very good for IM level or even for a good prepared FM. The understanding and feeling that you need to play it well is much deeper than with the Benko.
Also the Benko positionally speaking is very sound and the tactics and lines are not so difficult to remember, the patterns repeat a lot and it's much easier to get good positions fast. It also annoys a lot the d4 players, don't forget this point too! 😀

Ruy Lopez

Is there a course to learn the Ruy Lopez?

Replies

No, we offer the Scotch for White as a response against e5. 😃 Why don't you try it?😅

Sharp Positions

i always find it difficult to keep track of everything in sharp positions, i'm 1800 on chess.com and i've been stuck there for almost 7 months

 

i want to know how my thinking process should be to do well in this type of positions,

like what are the things i should check out first and the things that i should prevent

 

Replies

Did you check out our course 7Q Method - How to Find a Plan in Any Position?
https://chessmood.com/course/chess-planning-7q-method
This course should help you to find plans, check it out.😀

Change email

Is there any way to change our email for our account

Replies

I don't see a clear way, maybe try contacting the team to see

Yes, please contact us at support and explain your case:

https://chessmood.com/contact

😀

Is there a pgn of all the puzzle in the quiz by the order they appear there?

I try now to solve the quiz but this time when I look at alternatives for the defender that is not in the solution that I know and also try to calculate all the line before the first move so I cannot use tricks like memorizing the move without understanding why and playing it.

For example in puzzle 31 in the quiz you need also to calculate 1.Bxg6 Nxe3 that is not in the solution.

a possible line 2.Bxf7+ Kf8 3.Qxd4 Bxd4 4.Be3 with the double threat against the rook and also Bh6 mate.

I think it can be productive to have a pgn not only with the solution lines but also with alternatives like this(Nxe3 is not suggested by the engine but I think that it is the main alternative that humans should consider except capturing the queen.

Replies

ChessMood Courses

I am a 2265 blitz chess player. Do I have to watch the beginning courses and then the advanced ones or can I directly skip to the advanced ones

Another query, How do I practice the endgames knowledge from the endgame section? 
Thank You!

Replies

As for your first question, if you are talking about CM openings, then yes, Chessmood recommends watching the begginer course first and the wayching step by step one at a time.

If you are talking about the middlegame courses, I reccomend going straight to the advanced middlegame courses as the others might be too easy. Although remember to watch Blunderproof and SLP course as they will help you a lot!

If you are talking about the endgame, then first take the U2000 endgame theory quiz, if everything is easy and simple, go to advanced(Make sure to go in order there! You have to learn pawn endgames before say rook endgames!) and watch there.

To practice the endgame knowledge, the best way is to start from a certain endgame position and then play from that position with your training partner. That way both of you will practice both sides of the position!

I hope this heps you!

Time Management

Hello ChessMood family,

 

So recently I played five OTB games and on all of them, I was under time pressure (I'm rated 1800 btw and the opponents ranged from 1800-2300). This wasn't the first time this happened in an OTB game and I don't know how I can fix this. This cost me three games out of five. I am thinking too much on one move and once I thought for 40 minutes on one move (time control was 90+30). I'm not sure how to fix this. Can you help me?

Replies

Hello H.L.,

this webinar helped me a lot:

https://chessmood.com/event/webinar-time-management

Please watch it!

The point that helped me tremendously: Avo says that during a game chess

is just a game. Only afterwards it is science. You probably know the problem.

I was immediately able to understand what he ment, because this is exactly the point

why I found myself in time trouble all the time: That I was way to scientific and not practical

ON THE BOARD. I am still in time trouble too often, but in the end, this will be exactly the

knowledge that WILL help me. 

Again: Please watch it, it is great!

I am also a player who get into a time trouble almost every game.
I think it is a problem of most players who love chess because they like to think.

Usually players who do not get into time trouble are the weaker players.

You can find the past webinars on the Events page, just use the filter webinar and you will get results like this one:

https://chessmood.com/events#6

You will find other topics here.

Good luck and good study!😀

calculation

do we have eta on when the new calculation course will come out?? new too chess mood , love the content so far!!

Replies

Soon, very soon! 😁

Advice sought re Lichess puzzle

Hi all,

 

My noob brain is struggling to see why the moves I made weren't preferable to the Lichess solution.

 

I play Rxf4 taking the white bishop and putting the king in check. King moves to e3. I play Re4 putting the king in check again and the rook is covered by the queen on g4.  White captures the rook with Qxe4.  OK, I'm fine with all of this (and so is Lichess!).

 

Now, my move is Qg5 checking the king again and once the king moves my pawn on d5 takes white's queen and play continues.  However, the Lichess solution is for queen takes queen and then Rxe4 so I lose my queen.

 

What am I missing? 😀

 

https://lichess.org/training/KeAJ0

 

 

Replies

Hello, after your move Qg5+, white can block with Qf4, and we are down an exchange.

After qxe4 rxe4 and pawn takes e4, we are up a piece! (Dont forget the c8 bishop :)

I hope this helps!

Pawn Structure Course

Hello Chessmood fam,

 

Is there a course here that focuses on proper pawn structure (e.g., when to make pawn breaks / take hook, etc.)?

 

Thanks so much and keep up the great content!

Replies

Hello, at the moment, no such course exists, mabye in the future though!

We ALL miss things!

In the Dec 5, 2023 Racing to 1500 Part 7 event, I think I caught a big miss.

At close to the 33:47 mark, black plays … Ra6.  To my eyes, that is a free rook with Qxa6.  No one viewing caught this live, and during the review no one mentioned it.  

Even Petrosian hung his Queen once as a GM.  But I think the story goes his opponent missed it, because he was …. you know….Petrosian!

Replies

Hey there,

Yes, that is correct :-)
We were all focus on the Kingside attack🙂

Here is the game I was referring to.

Tigran V Petrosian vs David Bronstein (1956) (chessgames.com)

Tactic Ninja Course - Section 4 - Fork - Lesson 11. Fork with a Tempo

Hi guys, I don't understand Avetik's reasoning here on why white moving bishop to e3 is a blunder.

 

So after the white bishop move...

 

Black moved his pawn to d5, trying to get the c4 white bishop to move and then ultimately, move his black pawn forward to d4 - forking the white bishop at e3 and white knight at c3.

 

To stop the fork at d4...

 

I don't understand why white trading pawns and knights at e5 is a blunder. Avetik said black is up a piece here, but after the pawn and knight trades, both white and black have 14 pieces on the board.

 

Can someone please tell me why Avetik said black is up a piece here and therefore winning this exchange?

 

Looking forward to your reply,


Richard
 

Replies

Dear Richard,

After d5 White shoud take on d5. If White it goes e5 Black can just retreat the knight to e8, and the Bishop is still under attack. 

Since the Bishop is under attack, when it moves, the d5 pawn will advance to d4 forking the Bishop and the Knight on e3 and c3.

😁The other option for White is to take exd5, but then Black plays exd5 attacking the Bishop again because White has a pawn supporting this central break and does not take with the Knight! Then again is the same thing: Since the Bishop is under attack, when it moves, the d5 pawn will advance to d4 forking the Bishop and the Knight on e3 and c3.💪

Opposite side castling

I never know what to do when myself and my opponent are castled on opposite sides of the board. I always end up blundering something because I don't know how to navigate. How to fix this and what to study?

Replies

What's your level? Please tell us your ratings, age, etc. the more info the better, 😅to be able to recommend something… 

solving puzzles in the chess ninja quiz

I already solved all the puzzles twice and most of them more than twice.

I measure time on a clock and finally I did the first 400 in less than an hour with one stupid mistake when I thought that I won the problem and thought about something else when moving the mouse so promoted to a queen instead of a rook(I did that problem correctly already in the previous tries and of course I memorized that I need to promote to a rook).

Note that I practically “cheat” in solving the puzzles in the quiz because not only that I did not calculate in advance the all lines that I need to calculate(and in problems that you need to underpromote then not considering promotion to queen and seeing the stalemate only because you remember that you need to underpromote is not the idea of the puzzle) but also in the fact that there are cases when I am sure about the first move and play it without calculating the full line before making the first move.

I wonder if it is a good idea to compose a pgn file that has all the solutions(that mean not only the line that people need to play but also the lines that people need to calculate because practically in a game there may be a similiar position when the same tactics does not work and you see it only if you calculate).

There are many problems in the quiz that I expect strong players to see the solution immediately but there are problems in the quiz with many moves that I do not believe even GM's can be sure about the solution in a few seconds assuming they do not memorize the exact position and in a similiar position when one piece is in a different square the solution may be correct or not correct and you practically need to calculate.

Replies

New article: The Surrender Experiment: How I Raised 100 Points in Three Months

Would you like to raise 100 points in three months and have more fun than you usually do? 
If you said “Yes” you will like today’s article. 

Recently GM Avetik ran an experiment where there would be only one subject - him. He would surrender to his HEART, SOUL & BODY, and play chess ONLY and ONLY when his heart wanted to. 

In three months, and only in four sessions, he raised 100 rating points. 
How did he do that? 
And how you can do it even better? 

Here is the link ⤵️
https://chessmood.com/blog/surrender-experiment

Replies

This is how I think motivation works. Your brain acts like many parts, each one shouting its demand. All you hear is your current thought train (or interruption to it) and how you feel. Ever tried to work through being hungry? That shouting starts to get louder and louder until it's hard to focus on anything. That's how we stay alive. Once we've eaten, it goes back to being quiet again. Or ever had that one thing was bothering you, you deal with it, then suddenly something else pops up you weren't aware of?

Being in-tune with yourself can help massively. I'm wondering whether I should even make my work days longer (which I control). When my mind is on chess, go ahead and ‘fill that need’ now, then go back to work with the ‘chess bug’ leaving me alone. Work a little later to get enough hours done of course, but it'll help on days where in the end I had to work longer anyway because I wasn't feeling work, despite having to do it and felt I needed to work longer to get what I'd planned done.

Also going for a walk can help down periods, but I guess the topic is about hacking chess motivation, not getting on with work :)

Interesting experiment. Maybe I can play a few games in the middle of work.
But I wonder how my teammates would respond. Especially my boss :)

Also the CM you crushed with chessmood openings is from the same city as me(see the last 4 letters of their username). Wasn't me though.

As always, great article.

It’s very interesting as usual ! I have an idea to try this and still keep playing regularly to improve . Having an account where I only play when the 3 conditions are present . And another account for the rest of the games I will play even if not perfect condition or for training purpose 

Nice article and even better games GM Grigoryan!

Looking forward for part 2!!  💪💪💪

I doubt if I can do better.
In the last days I played many games and trained even more with courses of chess mood with no improvement in my lichess blitz rating that is now 2071 and was higher in the past(my best blitz lichess rating was 2225 and when I started training with the new openings it was slightly more than 2100).

In the last weeks I finished the following courses:
1)Opening principles
2)White mood opening
3)Black mood opening
4)Opening Avengers
5)Tactic Ninja

I also started other courses that I did not finish.

I also took the quiz in courses 2,3,5 and for 2,3 I took it again and again until I could finish the quiz with 100%
for the tactic Ninja course I also trained again and again in the first problems before deciding to solve all of them(in the last try I had only one mistake out of the first 400 problems that I repeat them and also solved the rest of the problems without many mistakes and of course when I had a mistake I thought in order to find the right move).

I played nine 5+3 games today after all of this training and my rating did not improve.
Noticing tactics in blitz games is clearly different than solving them in puzzles and practically I also miss tactics in my online blitz games but the problem is not only tactics but the fact that I do not understand some of the openings.

For example the pawn sacrifice in the line 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 h6 5.Bxf6 Qxf6 6.exd5 Bb4 7.dxe6 Bxe6 

Here is the last game that I lost with this opening when I got nothing good from this opening.

https://lichess.org/4x6nj7r03S2b

when Bxc3+ was probably not good but the real mistake was 9…Nc6

Why I thought that the line with 9…Nc6 and trading queens is good?

Here is a different game I lost in the same opening
https://lichess.org/5KWByDzN/black#17

I needed to play 9…Qxe6+ based on the engine but I thought it is bad to trade queens when I am a pawn down so I played 9…fxe6
I learned from that game that the bad pawn structure of white is worth a pawn so I did not care about trading queens in the other game that I post.
Note that I analyze every game with a computer to understand at least part of my mistakes.

I've read the article, and I have a question. Isn't improving your rating in this scenario not the same as improving your chess? As Avetik said, your rating is the average of your good and bad sessions, and you raise it to be only the average of your good sessions. Your skill level stays the same, doesn't it? And where rating really counts, which is over the board, you can't choose to only play your good sessions, you have to play all "sessions"(tournaments) you sign up for, at the given date and time. So basically you're only making a number go up, right? You're not really getting any chess improvement just from playing online when you're in the right mood, or am I missing something? Love

Nice article. 

Most of all because of this:

Should you start the experiment?   

If you want to improve your chess skills, no, you shouldn’t. 

You need to study, practice, and analyze your games.
You need to detach yourself from your results and focus on growth. 

I mean, most of the time articles and interviews are about rating growth, but this clearly explain the difference between chess growth & chess rating. 

Thank you coach, as usual. 

Tactics Advice

Hi. I saw in the blog that “Many beginners make a mistake trying to solve puzzles without learning the patterns.” . I am loss. What pattern I am suppose to learn. ? currently, when I see  a puzzle. I actually dun really know what to do and even if I solve it, I have to stare at it for a long time.

  1. what is the chain of thoughts should I have in my mind when solving puzzle so that I dun need to stare blindly at it and ultimately improve? all Advice are welcome. Thanks so much  
     

Replies

My main recommendation would be to just watch the Tactic Ninja Course:

https://chessmood.com/course/tactic-ninja

You will have a very sharp tactical vision by the end of the course. 😃

If your level is under 1000, go until section 23.

Lichess also has a very nice “practise” page: https://lichess.org/practice

You can learn basic tactical patterns there.

What Chess Donkey said.  Tactic Ninja is a great course (well, I haven’t found anything here that”s NOT great, but that’s another conversation :) .

Anyway, I wonder how long it takes people to finish! I try to make a rule for myself: every time I get on ChessMood I look at one section (minimum) of Tactic Ninja before I do anything else. Good luck!

I would advise you to watch the Tactics Ninga course and remember to find checks, captures, attacks and more to improve your pattern recognition                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     p.s. Do a lot of puzzles and think about what the other side will play

           

Attachment

Hi, I've just noticed that in the Attachments of the SLP course, the slide with the main takeaways is wrong. The column ‘Complicating’ is correct, but ‘Creativity’ and ‘Psychology’ are just repeating the contents of the first column. It would be very helpful if this was fixed.

Replies

Chessmood is a big site. Be patient and I am sure Avetik and others will get it fixed

Yes, we fixed it yesterday, just didn't reply sooner to this thread.

About opening repertoire

I do not think that most players with rating near fide rating 2000 remember more theory than what we have in starter courses white mood and black mood opening. 

I would like opening repertoire for white and black for level below fide master level(that should help players to improve to fide rating 2100 or 2200)  to have the following properties:
1)Relatively small numbers of lines(not more lines than what you have in the starter repertoire)
2)Not to have bad lines(I found by analysis with stockfish that starter course both for black and for white has some bad lines and with bad lines I do not mean something that is not the best move based on stockfish and I have no problem with something that stockfish evaluates as 0.2 pawns weaker than best move but can surprise the opponent but there are few cases when it is a lot worse than it)

3)If possible also to lead to better positions with black in most of the games against players with fide rating 1800-2100 in the first position I am out of my repertoire.

I see that the opening that you call the french attack has at least one bad line for black that is evaluated by stockfish as +1 for white(still did not learn all of it but 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Ng8 is a bad line for black based on stockfish).

I play with black 1…e6 against 1.e4 in the last years(not with the same lines that you suggest in the starter course and I may change my lines) but I never had the idea of getting an advantage in this opening after the opening.

Practically I think my opening was always a relative weakness of me relative to my rating(and it is not only about memorizing but also about finding good moves in the opening when both me and my opponent are out of book).

When I play against significantly weaker players than me then of course I can win most of the games but in many cases it is inspite of the fact that my opponent won the opening stage so I thought some basic course about the opening not with many lines can help me but I do not like to get bad positions based on my opening repertoire(with the hope to get a good position because my opponent does not find the best move).

Of course I understand that if the opponent know more than me in the lines that I play I may do a mistake and get a bad position out of the opening but I think that with a good opening small repertoire in big majority of the cases it is not going to happen against players below fide master level simply because they do not know enough theory(and even if they memorize more theory positions than me they will not know a lot against some not common but good lines in the small repertoire).

4)If you like so much e6 with black against everything then what is the reason to have 1.e4 in the white mood starter course and not 1.e3 when you can get what you call the french attack with one more tempo?

Replies

I disagree, having an high rating doesn’t always mean having a better memory, I think the courses here aren’t too big and sometimes there are alternative options like in the French for white and the Scotch if you want something with low theory 

https://chessmood.com/blog/how-to-win-chess-tournaments-7-key-principles

shows you that openings aren’t key and there are other factor's

This website uses cookies. To learn more, visit our Cookie Policy.