Is it tough to become Grandmaster now or it was tough to become Grandmaster in 90s?
Another question is do you guys like the K- factor thing in fide rating system .I seriously hate it. For example a guy of below 18 have huge advantage to improve and become GM on the other hand if a guy crossed 18 then K factor makes the task super complex.
Coach how you guys handle this terrible rating system. I know talent matters and you can achieve goals but this is also truth we are not lucky to win all open events and achieve GM title in easy way. For me all I can do is work hard and as coach suggested play events and analise your games with strong players but what to do against this rating system?
Take a look at the article in the bottom and see a guy got 2500 from 2000 and he was below 18. I know he is talented so he deserve it but don't you guys think that this rating system helped him a lot. On the other hand if a guy who is same talented is above 18 then his rating graph won't climb up like it does in this case.
https://chessbase.in/news/vardaan-nagpal-reaches-2501/
Your ideas will be useful.
Hello ChessMood Family! Hello Champions!
I've good news for you!
As I promised earlier, soon we are going to upload many new courses related to the middlegame and endgame.
The new one - "Happy Pieces" is uploaded.
https://chessmood.com/course/
This gonna be one of the most important courses you've ever watched about chess.
Enjoy the first part. The rest is coming!
