Chess forum by Grandmasters

Best games anthology

Hello, Is there an easy way to access the 'best games' from the forum from the previous months? Could be useful to create a separate database somewhere with these (eg pgn that could be replayed) and even better if these were separated in 2 categories: Chessmood openings (I guess these are de facto model games!) and other openings. And while I'm at it, why not collect all the games played by the GMs on streams (so many different handles, hard to keep track :-) and also coillect these in a database (I understand the videos best ones have been pulled out and added to the opening courses, but lots of games would be very helpful to answer the question 'what would GM Gabuzyan or GM Avetik play in such a position' when it is not in the course) Just a thought :-)

Replies

Hi Regis,

No, there is no “easy way” to do it. You can search for “best games” and you will get all the threads with the best games as in: 

https://chessmood.com/forum?page=&filter=latest&channel=all&search=best%20games

The problem with all these games is that some may not be so good and it would take many hours to arrange it. It takes an awful lot of time just to select the best ones every month. 
Some students collect every month the games that they like the most, for their self study, we know that. 
Regarding the games from the streams, there are not so many handles (15 on chess.com and 3 on lichess -all can be seen in the streams-) and we know that a few students also collect the games in a database (always having in mind that they are played during the streams and are blitz games).  This is something that they do regularly and it is an excellent idea. 

It goes in one ear and out the other 😁 

Is it a familiar feeling? 
Let’s crush it! 

In today’s article, you’ll learn: 

✅ How to REALLY learn something instead of illusionary learning
✅ How to memorize everything you’ve learned instead of forgetting 50% of it the next day and the other 90% at the end of the week 
✅ How to effectively use this Bold-Unbold technique in chess and in other areas

It also comes with many interesting stories. 
https://chessmood.com/blog/bold-unbold-technique

Feel free to share your thoughts with us under this forum thread. 

#CoGro 

#RightMood_RightMove 

Replies

I do something similar myself - take notes (of what I need to learn or was interesting) and only revise that which I can't remember. Too many of us prefer to revise what we already know as it makes us feel good. You also have to refresh it with increasing periods otherwise you'll forget again. However this is getting close to the chessable method which I believe we said wasn't so good. So what separates this from a single iteration of spaced repetition?

I will try this bold-unbold technique. I used to make summarizes, which asked lots of work to make and lots of time to read quickly before a game. This bold-unbold thing looks like it's less work to make and to read before a game, so I get more time to learn new things.

Great article, this is similar to how I got through law school studies. Agree with the other comments that this approach supports understanding and unconscious competence rather than rote memorization.

Great idea, I've started creating my own PowerPoint slides to help me crystalize the ideas of the Scotch course (example attached).

Hi Avetik First, I'd like to point out to a key concept my father always impressed on me: When one writes something down, they remember it much better. Countless occasions later I can say that it's true! So, as a first step, I will start to write down all the ideas I learned and then, as a second step bold/unbold and review. Its a great concept and I truly believe its a terrific addition to any study method. Thank you again for another well written piece of wisdom Ovi PS The good writing ideas you listed are a solid application of the principle.

Great insights as usual. There is one step though that I struggle with: "review before playing" I totally get and agree to writing down the key points of what you wanted to learn. With the last step of reviewing what you remembered and what you still need to get into your head, I'm also fine. But reviewing beforehand only makes sense to me when you know what you are going to face (like your example with writing). In chess though I think there are very few key points that occur in every game (like "develop your pieces") that make sense for a little advanced player. Instead there is many specific knowledge (like "remember the g6-tricks in Benko if he doesn't go Nc3"). Do you reccomend to review all before playing? Looking forward to additional wisdom as I'm trying to create a useful routine how to take the most out of my played games. Marcus

I have to try this methot ! I would prefer doing it by writing it down on paper if possible but do you have any suggestion on how to do it as bold / unbold wont work multiple times ? I could start with very few objectives and write them every time , it could be done but as soon as it will grow , it will be a lost of time .. but if I see the value of it for me , then I could switch to doc ..

I use a similar method... I print on a paper sheet 6 chess diagram, all of them related to the same theme, let's say "Bishops Pair" or "Open file", whatever, and on the back of the paper sheet I print the solutions. Then I try to solve the exercises, in a fixed amount of time (usually 5 minutes). Like if I was playing on tournament. Then I check the solutions. If I'm correct, I mark the exercise with "Ok", othervise I mark it with a simple checkmark. I try this way for 18/24/30 exercises (3/5 sheets), in a couple of day. Then I repeat until I don't get three "OK" in a row for a given exercise. If so, I stop to solve that exercise, and continue with the remaining, unsolved 3 times in a row, ones. Then I move to the next set of exercises. I got the exercises from books like Hellsten, "Mastering Chess Strategy", or Polgar, "Chess Middlegames". The first is easier, the latter much more difficult. Is a good method, for me: I was oscillating in the range 1800/2050 in leechess blitz, and now, after one month of this method, I'm oscillating in the range 2080/2150, which makes me happy. I want to continue this way for a whole year, and see if I can reach 2300/2400, which is a National Master level, I would say.... Jmtc...

How to purchase events with MoodCoins?

I know how to do it with a course, but how to do it with an event?

Replies

Events are exclusive for Pro members. It is not possible to purchase events.

A fresh idea against the Scotch? (Chessbase article)

Hi guys, I came across this article on Chessbase https://en.chessbase.com/post/a-fresh-idea-against-the-scotch As far as I went through the in depth course on the Scotch (not for 100% yet) this seems to be a line not yet covered indeed. Lars Schandorff claims that in the 4. ... Bc5 line "White's rather primitive idea" (Oh really?) of Qe2 and Be3 can be tackled with the simple 6. ... d6 7. Qe2 a5! Our friend GM Gabuzyan is even mentioned after in the line 8. Nd5 a4 9. Nxb6 cxb6 but then the knight is forced back 10. Nd2 Nf6. This seems pretty logical indeed but white's positions feels a bit cramped. Do we have a good line against this 7. Qe2 a5 ? Any ideas / recommendations?

Replies

Already discussed here: https://chessmood.com/forum/pro-channel/about-scotch-4bc5

Yeah, I see and also in https://chessmood.com/forum/pro-channel/scotch-bc5-line-with-nf6-early-a5 which is mentioned in that post. Interesting idea for black indeed.

Error in the Petroff defense course?

I enjoyed the course and I think the 5.Nc3 move is very a good choice for white. However i believe there is a small inaccuracy in the third video of the first section, when it explains why 5...d5 is bad. After 6.Qe2 the knight on e4 is pinned and white is threatening to play d3 and take it with the pawn. Here the video says that 6...Qe7 is the only move to keep the knight, but after 7.Nxd5 black is losing material. 6...Be7 is a move that unpin the knight and only loses a pawn. So, indeed 5...d5 is bad, but black is not losing a full piece.

Replies

Puzzle rush and sight of board

I've been playing puzzle rush on chesscup.org and noticed a few things. Simple things especially geometric motives: forks/double attack, discovery, back rank mates; and common sequences I see instantly (the puzzles sub 1500). Also piece being en-prise (particularly one just moved) or leaving something en-prise, king/queen safety I see quickly as my attention gets brought there quickly. I struggle more with when on a busy board involvement takes place outside an area (i.e. I've not noticed a piece), or when there are several functional relationships (e.g. protects/pins) and I miss one or a combination. Also the problem of locking onto an aspect (e.g. it must be a mate) and missing something else is an issue. I guess I don't tactically suffer and can solve complex problems because I can revert back to consciously thinking about the problem (checks, captures, threats) and trying different sequences, especially if it's a puzzle and I know there must be something there. So my thoughts are on how I can improve what I can take in from a board. Like speed reading, the more words you can take in/comprehend during a single fixation determines how fast you can read. I suspect it probably is a lot to do with neural recruitment - the more neurons dedicated to sight of board the more you see without having to think about it. Thus strategies related to neural recruitment are probably going to be beneficial, but it's just working out a training process (something like seeing puzzles that are just above my instant solving ability and training those or seeing aspects of those in a variety of ways until it becomes in-built). The benefits of this will be less blunders/things missed in low time, better calculation/visualisation as more will be appreciated and also freeing up thinking for higher level considerations to the position itself. Short term though it might destroy my blitz play (I'm noticing that), though I did notice my long-play way was better as I was seeing opponent's ideas quicker, though maybe hard to draw a conclusion with a sample of 2 games. Sadly you can't start puzzle rush from a certain rating of puzzle to get more practice on higher puzzles, select puzzles from a certain rating etc. But maybe treating some lichess puzzles as puzzle rush (30 in 3 minutes is up to 6 seconds a position, but probably 8-9 on the latter ones as the initial ones can be solved instantly) would help.

Replies

I do aimchesss daily tactic challenge . Its a 10 min max with 3 mistakes max. First ones as easy as chesscom but they get really harder after 20 . You can only do it once a day but can compare with others as we all do the same problems . Never tried chesscup. I used to do chesstempo long time ago with a short timer for hard puzzle but I was blundering too much which can be good in long term .. i m slow usually on these rushes , but I prefer solving less and being sure of my move . It shows in bullet where I m lower rated

One thing I did that might have helped improve my puzzle rush score was collect puzzles that I got wrong and put them into a Chessable course that I'd run through every so often. I didn't collect all my failed puzzles but instead focused on, in rough priority order: - Easier ones that I somehow overlooked. Typical reasons were things like a distracting feature, a backwards defender, or a novel configuration of pieces even though the motif was simple. - Interesting patterns that seemed to be recurring and potentially useful. - Some puzzles that required just a tiny bit more calculation than normal. Notably I typically did not add the hardest puzzles to my collection. I eventually collected a couple of hundred puzzles.

About Scotch 4....Bc5

Interesting for CM members is the following link : https://en.chessbase.com/post/a-fresh-idea-against-the-scotch Good read ! 👍

Replies

There is 2 games mentioned in the article of GM Gabuzyan with white which ended in draws

Opening against 1.b4

Hi Avetik sir, What to play against 1. b4? Can you make course on it? Before that please share quick ideas against it. Thank you for your support and understanding!

Replies

Omkar,

After your comments in the QA session last day where you stated that you want to become a GM in 3 years, we would suggest you to study a lot more the courses that we already have. I checked the courses that you already worked on and you need to speed up your pace, otherwise it will be very difficult to even get close to your goal.

We will occasionally do a short course on b4 probably in the near future, but do not worry about b4, it is not a good move, just play healthy moves in the center. Personally the only thing I used in my games has been e5, Bxb4, Nc6 winning a tempo on the Bishop that will take e5  and that's it. Healthy development after that. No need to know more since you will almost never face this, and even if you face this opening, having a good center will give you a good game.

What you need to focus on is the program that we provided you and follow it trough. You can do it! Do the most effective things… 😀

Scotch Bc5 Line with Nge7

Hello there! First, I was playing with the black pieces against this IM who grounded me down, and then after I rematched him, we got the game - 1.e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 ed4 4. Nd4 Bc5 5. Nb3 Bb6 6. Nc3 and here he played Nge7, which is not in my file, and if I am correct, is not covered in the course? I played 7.Qe2 hoping for d6, trying to transpose to the line 6...d6 7.Qe2 Nge7 8. Be3 0-0 9. 0-0-0 f5 10. f4, but he played 7...0-0 8. Be3, thinking that he will transpose, but he played 8...f5, and after 9. 0-0-0, he went f4 and blocked my kingside expansion. I later won the game on time😁😁😁, but my question is about the opening. What do we play against 6...Nge7? Thanks, Ashwin

Replies

This early knight move gives us additional options since d6 is not played. We can go Bg5 first, Qd2 and 0-0-0. Transposing can be ok  like you tried to do too (although you forgot f4) but why not try to get a bit more?
 This move is from the course, but I do not know exactly which video, if f6 Bf4, Qd2 and long castle with usual plans. 😜

New Sudy Plans, Advanced Dutch/French. Let's Go!

Hi ChessMood family! My first post! Am in the category of player looking to reach 2000 OTB rating, and so was very interested to read through the new study plans recently posted. Have to say that whilst reading through the plans I was very excited to hear that the advanced dutch and french are being recorded. The 'starter' courses for the dutch and french attack are just awesome, so can't wait for the advanced courses to be released. Hopefully soon?!! Looking forward to growing my game with the help of ChessMood. Let's go!

Replies

Mating Matador Bug

Mating Matador Section 21 - Morphy's Mate Example 1 Quiz 1,2 All rook moves along the g-file >= g3 are mate, but if I play Rg5, Rg6 or Rg7 it marks it wrong

Replies

It might have to do with you need to take something for example Rg3 might be threatening to take the f pawn so the bishop can check the king. Also you can check analysis to see what is wrong with the moves